| |
Grading
of Gemstones
Earlier, the world generally referred to
two types of gemstones -- precious and semiprecious. Diamonds,
rubies, emeralds, sapphires (and sometimes opals and pearls)
were considered as precious gemstones, and all other stones,
as semiprecious gemstone.
Today this distinction is obsolete and meaningless. Since many precious stones
can be bought for cheap, while fine peaces of some semiprecious stones such
as tsavorite (a green garnet) or tourmaline (especially Paraiba tourmaline)
could be very expensive. Thus, the old terms are inappropriate in current situations. |
|
Today, the gem market is divided into two separate domains --
diamonds and colored stones. Even this distinction is arbitrary
and misleading,
as many diamonds are colored and many "colored stones" are not.
However, the same basic principles are involved in grading gemstones
of both types.
There are "4 C's" in diamonds namely, color, clarity, cut, and
carat weight. Organizations such as the Gemological Institute of
America (GIA) and CIBJO (Confederation Internationale de la Bijouterie,
Joaillerie, Orfevrerie, des diamants, perles, et pierres precieuses)
have well established these standards for judging qualities in
diamonds. However, there are no similarly accepted standards for
judging other stones, although several systems enjoy limited success.
One major difference between the diamond and colored stone markets
is that the diamond market is largely controlled by one organization
-- De Beers Consolidated Mines. Through their near-monolithic control
of diamond mining and distribution, this company has done much
to create a fairly stable market for diamonds, and relatively small
diamonds are readily available in a wide variety of qualities.
In contrast, most colored stones are mined with more primitive
methods, by much smaller companies, and supplies are much more
variable. Many colored stones are much rarer than diamonds of comparable
size and quality and are often unavailable. A sizeable deposit
of a stone may be discovered and quickly distributed to the market,
only to become scarce again in a couple of years. Such uneven supply
and less regulated distribution often contribute to wide price
variations.
The following general rules apply to all gemstones:
Vivid, saturated colors are more highly prized than subdued or
grayed-out colors. Deeper colors are more highly prized than lighter
ones, unless the depth of color is so great as to make the stone
appear blackish. The best color for any gemstone should be obvious
from several feet or even several yards away. For example, a ruby
should be intensely red from across a room, and a blue sapphire
should be obviously blue, not black. The exception to the rule
occurs when the extremes are desired -- truly colorless diamonds
are valued more highly than those with pale colors, and a truly
black diamond would be worth more than one that is merely dark
gray.
Larger stones are more highly prized than small ones, although
stones too large for use in jewelry tend to have lower per carat
prices.
Gems with fewer and smaller inclusions are more highly prized than
those with more numerous and larger inclusions, unless the inclusions
contribute in a positive manner to the appearance of the stone.
For example, insect inclusions increase the value of amber. Fine
inclusions that cause star or cat's eye effects increase the value
of stones such as corundum or chrysoberyl. Quartz containing large
included crystals of rutile or tourmaline is often more valuable
than quartz without. Characteristic "horsetail" inclusions are
preferred in demantoid.
More durable stones are generally more prized than those of lesser
durability.
Rarer stones are more highly prized than more common varieties.
However, if the stone is so rare that it is essentially unknown
to the general public, its value suffers and it is relegated to
the status of a "collector stone." Stones such as boracite, childrenite,
ekanite, eosphorite, painite, and simpsonite are extremely rare,
attractive, and durable, but they are unlikely to command prices
appropriate to their rarity, because there are fewer persons aware
of them and eager to buy them.
Well cut stones of good symmetry, attractive design, and fine polish
are more prized than poorly cut stones. Unfortunately, many higher
priced stones, such as ruby and emerald, are often poorly cut in
order to maximize weight at the expense of appearance.
Stones of famous provenance are more prized than those lacking
in personal history.
Pairs or suites of stones matched for color, clarity, and cut are
more highly valued per carat than single stones, especially if
the stones are rare on an individual basis.
Stones that have been enhanced in color or clarity by artificial
means are worth considerably less than unaltered stones of the
same appearance.
Some gemstones are occasionally more in demand due to their use by well known personalities or due to intensive marketing, such as the various television shopping networks. Such increases in demand are faddish in nature and tend to be fairly short-lived.
|